Byrne v. Towson Detention Center et al
| Russell William Byrne |
| Towson Detention Center, Lee William Vaughn and Correctional Officer J. Doe |
| 1:2023cv00068 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT Joint by J. Doe, Towson Detention Center, Lee William Vaughn(Singleton, John) |
| Filing 6 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Russell William Byrne (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk to Amend the docket; Granting Plaintiff Twenty-eight (28) days from the date he receives a response from counsel to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 1/20/2023. (c/m as directed with forms on 1/23/2023 heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 New Case Notification Letter sent to Russell William Byrne. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)(C/M 1.11.2023) |
| Filing 3 UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Russell William Byrne(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Towson Detention Center, Lee William Vaughn, filed by Russell William Byrne. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
