Emrit v. British Secret Service et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
British Secret Service, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation, Ofice of International Judicial Assistance, House of Lords (England), House of Commons (England), Prime Minister Rishi, The Windsors, Buckingham Palace, Archbishop of Canterbury and Bletchley Park |
1:2023cv00180 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
A David Copperthite |
Julie Rebecca Rubin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 USCA Case Number 23-1172 for #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. Case Manager - Rachel Phillips (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit -- Initial(kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #8 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices.(kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Dismissing with prejudice #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin on 2/14/2023. (c/m 2/14/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin. Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite no longer assigned to the case. (bljs, Chambers) |
Filing 5 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 1/23/2023. (c/m 1/25/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite. Ronald Satish Emrit or counsel for Ronald Satish Emrit are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 2/6/2023. (c/m 1/25/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Ronald Satish Emrit. (c/m 1/25/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Archbishop of Canterbury, Bletchley Park, British Secret Service, Buckingham Palace, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation, House of Commons (England), House of Lords (England), Ofice of International Judicial Assistance, Prime Minister Rishi, The Windsors, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.