Chapman v. Maryland Department of State Police
| Derek Chapman |
| Maryland Department of State Police |
| 1:2023cv00442 |
| February 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| A David Copperthite |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 8/8/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 8/8/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Maryland Department of State Police.(Pickus, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Holdsworth Bowen on behalf of Maryland Department of State Police (Bowen, Mark)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Brett Harshbarger on behalf of Derek Chapman (Harshbarger, Laura)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Derek Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lewis, Dionna)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 5/31/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite. Maryland Department of State Police or counsel for Maryland Department of State Police are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 6/2/2023. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Maryland Department of State Police (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pickus, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 4
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 2/17/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite. Derek Chapman or counsel for Derek Chapman are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 3/3/2023. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued 21 days as to Maryland Department of State Police and Maryland Attorney General. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Maryland Department of State Police ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10441100.), filed by Derek Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Lewis, Dionna)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. Maryland Department of State Police | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derek Chapman | |
| Represented By: | Dionna Maria Lewis, Lewis |
| Represented By: | Laura Brett Harshbarger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maryland Department of State Police | |
| Represented By: | Mark Holdsworth Bowen |
| Represented By: | Phillip Michael Pickus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
