Height v. Warden
Petitioner: Malik D. Height
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 1:2023cv01085
Filed: April 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER dismissing the Petition without prejudice; directing Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 5/31/2023. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-05/31/2023)
April 24, 2023 Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Malik D. Height. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 4/24/23)
April 21, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Malik D. Height. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dass, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Height v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Malik D. Height
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?