Udo-Akang v. ASR Group et al
| Dr. Daniel Udo-Akang |
| ASR Group and Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2023cv01531 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Julie Rebecca Rubin |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability - Authorization to collect via civil action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER dismissing without prejudice #1 Complaint; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin on 7/24/2023. (c/m 7/24/2023 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting Plaintiff 21 days from the date of this Order to either pay the filing fee or to file a complete Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin on 6/26/2023. (c/m 6/26/2023 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Daniel Udo-Akang (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Daniel Udo-Akang. (c/m 6/6/2023 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Udo-Akang(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASR Group, Internal Revenue Service, filed by Daniel Udo-Akang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
