Waldt v. Jacobs Technology, Inc.
| Ryan A. Waldt |
| Jacobs Technology, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01565 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal-Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim To Allow Parties to Complete Settlement. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 7/14/2023. (vals, Chambers)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim To Allow Parties to Complete Settlement by Ryan A. Waldt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Stolarz, John) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 6/27/2023. (vals, Chambers)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Ryan A. Waldt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Stolarz, John) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE re #4 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions filed by Jacobs Technology, Inc..(Knauss, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jacobs Technology, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - Investigation Summary Report, #3 Exhibit 2 - OFCCP Findings, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Knauss, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Jacobs Technology, Inc., filed by Ryan A. Waldt.(mg3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Jacobs Technology, Inc. (Knauss, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, case number C-02-CV-23-000901. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10647859), filed by Jacobs Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint)(Knauss, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Waldt v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ryan A. Waldt | |
| Represented By: | John B Stolarz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jacobs Technology, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Neil Knauss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
