Scherck v. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC
Katherine Scherck |
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC |
1:2023cv01605 |
June 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
A David Copperthite |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 7/19/2023. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER CANCELLING Show Cause Hearing re: #5 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 7/19/2023. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC (Scheib, Megan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Susan Scheib on behalf of The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC (Scheib, Megan) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Katherine Scherck. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC waiver sent on 6/23/2023, answer due 8/22/2023.(Lozupone, Frank) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re: #8 Consent/Decline to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must correct the following error(s):**Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures, consent/declination forms are to be filed with the event 25 Pct Mag Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge OR 25 Pct Mag Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, both located in Other Filings >Other Documents. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 (FILED IN ERROR) NOTICE RE Corrected Consent to Magistrate (Van Deusen, Lucas) Modified on 7/10/2023 (dass, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re: 6 Consent/Decline to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must correct the following error(s):**Incorrect form used - complete the form Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here and refile using the event 25 Pct Mag Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge OR 25 Pct Mag Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, both located in Other Filings >Other Documents. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing Katherine Scherck to show cause for failure to comply with #Standing Order 2019-07. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/28/2023 02:00 PM in (proceed to the Clerk's Office to determine the location of the hearing) before the Chambers Judge. This Order shall be vacated if Katherine Scherck files a consent or declination prior to the show cause hearing date. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 6/30/2023. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 6/15/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite. Plaintiff Katherine Scherck or counsel for Katherine Scherck are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 6/29/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Katherine Scherck ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10655567.), filed by Katherine Scherck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Lozupone, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scherck v. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Katherine Scherck | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey P Bowman |
Represented By: | Frank Paul Lozupone, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC | |
Represented By: | Megan Susan Scheib |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.