Malla et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Niranjan Malla and Sabita Shrestha |
| Mr. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Merrick Garland, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ron Rosenberg, GREGORY COLLETT, Tracy Tarango, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2023cv01773 |
| July 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Julie Rebecca Rubin |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 60 days as to Gregory Collett, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ron Rosenberg, Tracy Tarango, and U.S. Attorney (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Niranjan Malla, Sabita Shrestha (Green, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against GREGORY COLLETT, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Ron Rosenberg, Tracy Tarango ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10684295.), filed by Sabita Shrestha, Niranjan Malla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - 7, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk, #4 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #5 Summons Merrick Garland, #6 Summons Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #7 Summons Ron Rosenberg, #8 Summons Gregory Collett, #9 Summons Tracy Tarango)(Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
