Furlong et al v. Brown et al
| Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company and Varietal Beer Company |
| Anthony G. Brown, Alan Silverstein, Barbara Wahl, Betty Buck, Robert Poole, Eric Morrissette, Jeffrey A. Kelly and The Hon. Anthony G. Brown |
| 1:2023cv02045 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company, Varietal Beer Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tanford, James)
|
|
Filing 10
QC NOTICES RE: #7 Motion to Dismiss filed by Anthony G. Brown, and #8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Anthony G. Brown. **The following attachments are missing - Proposed Orders. Plese file Proposed Orders using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Orders to #7 and #8 Motions respectively. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Improper Defendants Consent to Relief Requested in Motion filed by Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company, Varietal Beer Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bourgeois, John)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Anthony G. Brown (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint)(Oliner, Brian)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss Improper Defendants by Anthony G. Brown (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Improper Defendants))(Oliner, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Robert D Epstein. Directing attorney Robert D Epstein to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 8/8/2023. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of James Alexander Tanford. Directing attorney James Alexander Tanford to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 8/8/2023. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert D Epstein (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10742063.) by Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company, Varietal Beer Company(Bourgeois, John)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued 21 days as to Anthony G. Brown, Betty Buck, Jeffrey A. Kelly, Eric Morrissette, Robert Poole, Alan Silverstein, Barbara Wahl.(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for James Alexander Tanford (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10739162.) by Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company, Varietal Beer Company(Bourgeois, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Anthony G. Brown, Betty Buck, Jeffrey A. Kelly, Eric Morrissette, Robert Poole, Alan Silverstein, Barbara Wahl ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10736308.), filed by Varietal Beer Company, Mirage Beer Company, Douglas J. Furlong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Bourgeois, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
