Patel et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Rajanikant Kantilal Patel and Jagrutiben Rajanikant Patel |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2023cv02142 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rajanikant Kantilal Patel, Jagrutiben Rajanikant Patel. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 8/11/2023, answer due 10/10/2023; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 8/11/2023, answer due 10/10/2023.(Casazza, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10753307.), filed by Rajanikant Kantilal Patel, Jagrutiben Rajanikant Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Summons as to US Attorney's Office, #4 Summons as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #5 Summons as to USCIS, #6 Summons as to ATTORNEY GENERAL)(Casazza, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
