Ogden v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
| Corey Douglas Ogden |
| U.S. Office of Personnel Management |
| 1:2023cv02373 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Matthew J Maddox |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to U.S. Office of Personnel Management, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (c/m p 10/12/2023 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Maddox on 10/5/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 10/5/23)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Maddox. Plaintiff Corey Douglas Ogden or counsel for Corey Douglas Ogden are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 10/19/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m of NEF all forms/ standing order to pro se plaintiff 10/5/23) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER setting deadline for plaintiff to complete summons as instructed and for clerk to issue and return to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Maddox on 10/5/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m w/summons 10/5/23)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Corey Douglas Ogden. (c/m p 8/30/23 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Office of Personnel Management ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 5671.), filed by Corey Douglas Ogden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Attachment 2, #4 Attachment 3, #5 Attachment 4, #6 Attachment 5, #7 Summons, #8 Cover Letter, #9 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ogden v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corey Douglas Ogden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Office of Personnel Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
