Royal Plus, Inc. v. The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc. et al
Petitioner: Royal Plus, Inc.
Respondent: The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc., CTR Partnership, L.P. and Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv02395
Filed: August 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Remand Letter sent to Clerk of Circuit Court for Baltimore City. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 10/24/23)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER remanding case to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City; denying #3 and #4 Motions to Dismiss as moot; closing case. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 10/24/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 10/24/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Royal Plus, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate RPCAT, LLC for Royal Plus, Inc..(Rodgers-Waire, Cynthia)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 QC NOTICE: #14 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by Royal Plus, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **Please re-file and enter into the CM/ECF system all of the entities named on your document when prompted. This means when the screen comes up with a blank text box for you to enter affiliates, you need to enter the name RPCAT, LLC as listed on your document. In doing so, the system is able to run a cross-reference of any conflicts. If you need additional help, please call the clerk's office. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 (FILED IN ERROR) Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Royal Plus, Inc. (Rodgers-Waire, Cynthia) Modified on 9/15/2023 (dass, Deputy Clerk).
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 QC NOTICE: #12 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by Royal Plus, Inc. was filed incorrectly. **Please re-file and enter into the CM/ECF system all of the entities named on your document when prompted. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (FILED IN ERROR) Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Royal Plus, Inc. (Rodgers-Waire, Cynthia) Modified on 9/14/2023 (dass, Deputy Clerk).
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC re #10 Notice (Other) Amended Statement Pursuant to Standing Order 2021-13 (Katz, Joseph)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC - Statement Pursuant to Standing Order on Removal (Katz, Joseph)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Civil Cover Sheet) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Show Cause Order, #3 Petition to Establish and Enforce Mechanic's Lien, #4 Exhibit 1A, #5 Exhibit 1B, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5)(Katz, Joseph)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC identifying Corporate Parent The Clifford F. Boyle Family Trust, Other Affiliate Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Other Affiliate 4GEN LLC for Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC.(Katz, Joseph)
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 QC NOTICE re: #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by CTR Partnership, L.P., and #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc. **The following attachments are missing - Proposed Orders. Please file Proposed Orders using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Orders to #4 Motion, and #3 Motion. Thank you. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC was filed incorrectly. **(1) Civil Cover Sheet was not filed. (2) Circuit Court Documents were filed as one PDF in error. Please file the civil cover sheet and Circuit Court Documents using the event "Notice (Other)". The civil cover sheet will be the main document. The Circuit Documents will be attachments. However, each attachment must be its own separate PDF document. Once attached, please label each document by typing in the blank text box the name of the document as it appears on the document itself. This includes attaching each exhibit separately as well. After attaching each document, link the entry to #1 Notice of Removal when prompted. Thank you (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by CTR Partnership, L.P.(Katz, Joseph)
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc.(Katz, Joseph)
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 VERIFIED ANSWER to Complaint /Petition to Establish and Enforce Mechanic's Lien by CTR Partnership, L.P., Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC.(Katz, Joseph)
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and Memorandum in Support from Circuit Court for Baltimore City, case number 24-C-23-003075 ML. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BMDDC-10795683), filed by Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Summons, Shoe Cause Order, Petition to Establish and Enforce Mechanic's Lien, Exhibits)(Katz, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Royal Plus, Inc. v. The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Royal Plus, Inc.
Represented By: Cynthia E Rodgers-Waire
Represented By: Hugh Cropper, IV
Represented By: Louis J Kozlakowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Children's Hospital of Baltimore City, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph Larry Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CTR Partnership, L.P.
Represented By: Joseph Larry Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Landmark Recovery of Maryland, LLC
Represented By: Joseph Larry Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?