U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Len Stoler, Inc.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Len Stoler, Inc. t/a Len Stoler Auto Group and Len Stoler, Inc. |
1:2023cv02487 |
September 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
A David Copperthite |
Brendan Abell Hurson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Reassigned to Judge Brendan Abell Hurson. Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby no longer assigned to the case. (chs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 9/28/2023. (mg4s, Chambers) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Len Stoler, Inc. t/a Len Stoler Auto Group waiver sent on 9/13/2023, answer due 11/13/2023.(Shea, Casey) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Summons)(Shea, Casey) |
Case reassigned to Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite no longer assigned to the case. (chs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 9/20/2023. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 (FILED IN ERROR) Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 9/20/2023. (heps, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 9/20/2023 (heps, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or counsel for U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 10/4/2023. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Proposed Summons. To correct this problem, file Proposed Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Summons to #1 Complaint. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Nina A Menniti on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Menniti, Nina) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald L Phillips on behalf of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Phillips, Ronald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Len Stoler, Inc. t/a Len Stoler Auto Group, filed by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shea, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.