Shigley v. Tydings & Rosenberg LLP
Cheryl Shigley |
Tydings & Rosenberg LLP |
1:2023cv02717 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Adam B Abelson |
James K Bredar |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Tydings & Rosenberg LLP.(Stevens, David) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Cheryl Shigley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Supplemental Authority, #2 Exhibit Response to Position Statement)(Collins, Francis) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Tydings & Rosenberg LLP (Stevens, David) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Tydings & Rosenberg LLP (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Charge of Discrimination, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Stevens, David) |
Case Reassigned to Chief Judge James K. Bredar. Magistrate Judge Adam B. Abelson no longer assigned to the case. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Adam B. Abelson on 10/26/2023. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Adam B. Abelson. Cheryl Shigley or counsel for Cheryl Shigley are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 11/9/2023. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Tydings & Rosenberg LLP.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tydings & Rosenberg LLP ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10858050.), filed by Cheryl Shigley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Notice of Rights, #3 Summons)(Collins, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shigley v. Tydings & Rosenberg LLP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cheryl Shigley | |
Represented By: | Francis J Collins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tydings & Rosenberg LLP | |
Represented By: | David Michael Stevens |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.