Martin v. Shellenberger et al
| Michael D. Martin |
| Scott Shellenberger, Gerret P. Glennon, Brian Botts, Suzan Cohen and Office of the States Attorney for Baltimore County |
| 1:2023cv03308 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing without prejudice #1 COMPLAINT; granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/21/2023. (c/m 12/27/2023 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/21/2023. (c/m 12/27/2023 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Michael D. Martin. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 12.6.23) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael D. Martin(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian Botts, Suzan Cohen, Gerret P. Glennon, Office of the States Attorney for Baltimore County, Scott Shellenberger, filed by Michael D. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 5 Part 2, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
