Garcia v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
| Solimar Garcia |
| Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC, Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, Inc. and Family Dollar, LLC |
| 1:2023cv03317 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Brendan Abell Hurson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Ra O. Amen by Solimar GarciaAssociated Cases: 1:23-cv-03284-BAH, 1:23-cv-03317-BAH. The fee has already been paid.(Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Ra O. Amen (Filing fee $100, receipt number MDDC-11048642.) by Solimar GarciaAssociated Cases: 1:23-cv-03284-BAH, 1:23-cv-03317-BAH(Mason, Gary) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 1:23-cv-03284-BAH for pre-trial purposes only. Signed by District Judge Brendan Abell Hurson on 1/19/2024. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-03284-BAH et al.(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Cases associated: Create association to 1:23-cv-03284-BAH. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER STAYING CASE pending the outcome of the motion to consolidate filed in Gordon v. Zeroed-In Tech., LLC, No. 1:23-cv-03284. Signed by District Judge Brendan Abell Hurson on 1/9/2024. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Family Dollar, LLC (Chernof, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Dollar Tree, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Dollar Tree, Inc., Other Affiliate Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. for Dollar Tree, Inc..(Chernof, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, LLC NOTICE OF RELATED CASES (Chernof, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A STAY OF THIS ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE by Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, LLC(Chernof, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth L Chernof on behalf of Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, LLC (Chernof, Kenneth) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 405, receipt number AMDDC-10994964(Mason, Gary) |
| The case of Garcia v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is 23-cv-03317-BAH.The filing fee is $405.00, but you were charged $402.00 in error. The incorrect fee has been refunded. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, Inc., Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Solimar Garcia. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC waiver sent on 12/8/2023, answer due 2/6/2024.(Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dollar Tree, Inc., Family Dollar, Inc., Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10970956.), filed by Solimar Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice Letter, #2 Exhibit B - GAO Recommendations, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons to Dollar Tree, Inc., #5 Summons to Family Dollar, Inc., #6 Summons to Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC)(Mason, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
