Rami v. Nationwide General Insurance Co.
| Pathik Rami |
| Nationwide General Insurance Co. |
| 1:2023cv03348 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal - Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Nationwide General Insurance Co. re #1 Notice of Removal, Statement Concerning Removal (Lambert, Patricia) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Nationwide General Insurance Co. (Petty, Elliott) |
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 405, receipt number AMDDC-10982803(Lambert, Patricia) |
| The case of Rami v. Nationwide General Insurance Co., has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is 1:23-cv-03348-RDB. The filing fee is $405.00, but you were charged $402.00 in error. The incorrect fee has been refunded. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Consent MOTION to Stay Consent Motion for Stay of Action for a Period of Ninety Days. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/11/2023. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Nationwide General Insurance Co., filed by Pathik Rami. (Attachments: #1 Case Information Report)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENT (4) IS A COPY OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Consent MOTION to Stay Consent Motion for Stay of Action for a Period of Ninety Days by Nationwide General Insurance Co. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Lambert, Patricia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Notice of Removal from Circuit Court for Baltimore County, case number C-03-CV-23-004235. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10976554), filed by Nationwide General Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Attachment Civil Case Information Sheet, #4 Attachment Writ of Summons)(Lambert, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rami v. Nationwide General Insurance Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pathik Rami | |
| Represented By: | Stanford G Gann, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nationwide General Insurance Co. | |
| Represented By: | Elliott Daryl Petty |
| Represented By: | Patricia McHugh Lambert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
