Ghumman v. Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Saira Ghumman
Defendant: Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc. and The Boeing Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv03371
Filed: December 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Brendan Abell Hurson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2024 Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of William Ryan Waddell. Directing attorney William Ryan Waddell to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
January 23, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a ClaimDefendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc., The Boeing Company (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Murphy, Michael)
January 23, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Willaim Ryan Waddell (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11046144.) by Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc., The Boeing Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Murphy, Michael)
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time. Signed by District Judge Brendan Abell Hurson on 1/10/2024. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 9, 2024 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, and Enlarge Plaintiff's Time to Oppose a Rule 12 Motion if Filed by Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc., The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Murphy, Michael)
December 13, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc., The Boeing Company.(mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc., The Boeing Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-10981977.), filed by Saira Ghumman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Rapp-Tully, Stephanie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghumman v. Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saira Ghumman
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Rapp-Tully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boeing Intelligence & Analytics, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J Murphy
Represented By: William Ryan Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Represented By: Michael J Murphy
Represented By: William Ryan Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?