In RE: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenoes Aires, Argentina in the matter of Luis Fajnwaks
Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenoes Aires, Argentina in the matter of Luis Fajnwaks |
1:2023mc00035 |
January 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory as set forth. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 1/20/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In RE: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenoes Aires, Argentina in the matter of Luis Fajnwaks | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Court in Buenoes Aires, Argentina in the matter of Luis Fajnwaks | |
Represented By: | Patrick Garrett Selwood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.