Harrell v. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
| Joshua Harrell |
| University of Maryland School of Pharmacy |
| 1:2024cv00104 |
| January 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Matthew J Maddox |
| George Levi Russell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Case Reassigned to District Judge Matthew J. Maddox. Judge George Levi Russell, III no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Alter and Amend Judgment per Rule 59 by Joshua Harrell(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER ORDER denying without prejudice #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction; dismissing #1 Complaint; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 1/24/2024. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued 21 days as to University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. (Attachments: #1 USM Form)(c/em USMS 01/18/2024 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting Plaintiff 21 days to complete USM and Summons forms and return them to the Clerk; directing the Clerk to issue Summons and forward to the USMS upon receipt; directing the USMS to effectuate service. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 1/17/2024. (c/m w/ forms 01/17/2204 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT re: Notice to Defendant by Joshua Harrell(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notification Letter sent to Joshua Harrell. (c/m 01/11/2024 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Joshua Harrell (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Harrell(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, filed by Joshua Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 0, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11, #14 Summons)(bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Documents submitted via EDSS. Joshua Harrell consents to receive notice and service electronically. The Court recommends that all documents received electronically be printed or saved for future reference. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrell v. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Harrell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
