Clarke v. Collett et al
Burton Mclure Clarke |
Greg L. Collett, Ur Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
1:2024cv00116 |
January 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Brendan Abell Hurson |
Other Immigration Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER: On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff, Burton Mclure Clarke, filed a Notice of Dismissal pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This Court, having reviewed the Notice, hereby orders that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Brendan Abell Hurson on 2/27/2024. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Burton Mclure Clarke (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Griffith, Raymond) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Burton Mclure Clarke. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Griffith, Raymond) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Greg L. Collett, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Jaddou, #2 Mayorkas, #3 USA, #4 USAG) (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11029313.), filed by Burton Mclure Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Griffith, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.