Franklin et al v. Cleo AI Inc.
Shamia Franklin and Devon Chapman |
Cleo AI Inc. |
1:2024cv00146 |
January 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
J Mark Coulson |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Brittany Wakim (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11149895.) by Cleo AI Inc.(Stern, Jonathan) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Stephen J. Shapiro (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11149892.) by Cleo AI Inc.(Stern, Jonathan) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Cleo AI Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Cleo AI Ltd. for Cleo AI Inc..(Stern, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Cleo AI Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stern, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin. Cleo AI Inc. waiver sent on 1/25/2024, answer due 3/25/2024.(Abramowicz, Kevin) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Kevin Abramowicz. Directing attorney Kevin Abramowicz to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Kevin W. Tucker. Directing attorney Kevin W. Tucker to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kevin Abramowicz (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11041543.) by Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin(Rathod, Jason) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kevin W. Tucker (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11041541.) by Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin(Rathod, Jason) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Cleo AI Inc. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin or counsel for Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 1/31/2024. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cleo AI Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11034175.), filed by Devon Chapman, Shamia Franklin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Rathod, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.