Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Facema, LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Facema, LLC
Case Number: 1:2024cv00352
Filed: February 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: George Levi Russell
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default for want of answer or other defense by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohen, Saul)
February 9, 2024 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.. Facema, LLC served on 2/5/2024, answer due 2/26/2024.(Cohen, Saul)
February 6, 2024 Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Maristella Collazo Soto. Directing attorney Maristella Collazo Soto to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 2/6/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
February 6, 2024 Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Robert D Litowitz. Directing attorney Robert D Litowitz to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 2/6/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
February 5, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Maristella Collazo Soto (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11069722.) by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.(Cohen, Saul)
February 5, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert D. Litowitz (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11069665.) by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.(Cohen, Saul)
February 5, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Facema, LLC.(ah8s, Deputy Clerk)
February 2, 2024 Filing 3 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark (Cohen, Saul)
February 2, 2024 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Dinat Holding Corporation, S.A. for Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc..(Cohen, Saul)
February 2, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Facema, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11067686.), filed by Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Cohen, Saul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Facema, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Total Marketing Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Saul Cohen
Represented By: Stephanie H Bald
Represented By: Maristella Collazo Soto
Represented By: Robert D Litowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facema, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?