Lucas v. Bank of America et al
| Lauren Rae Lucas |
| Bank of America, Brian Glou, Wendy Nipper, Lee Anne Eckenrode and Carolyn Grant-Suttie |
| 1:2024cv00364 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Brendan Abell Hurson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting Plaintiff 21 days to complete the corrected summons for Defendant Bank of America and the five U.S. Marshal forms for defendants and return them to the Clerk; directing the Clerk to issue summons upon receipt and forward as directed to U.S Marshal; directing the U.S. Marshal to effectuate service. Signed by District Judge Brendan Abell Hurson on 4/1/2024. (c/m w/ forms 04/01/2024 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Lauren Rae Lucas. (c/m 02/07/2024 - bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lauren Rae Lucas(bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America, Lee Anne Eckenrode, Brian Glou, Carolyn Grant-Suttie, Wendy Nipper, filed by Lauren Rae Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
