Doe v. Reliantcy, Inc.
| John Doe |
| Reliantcy, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00380 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Erin Aslan |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Reliantcy, Inc. (Burton, Meighan) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Reliantcy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Burton, Meighan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe. Reliantcy, Inc. served on 3/3/2024, answer due 3/25/2024.(Eidelman, Levi) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued 21 days as to Reliantcy, Inc..(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher. Magistrate Judge Erin Aslan no longer assigned to the case. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Aslan on 2/7/2024. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Erin Aslan. John Doe or counsel for John Doe are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 2/21/2024. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Jury Trial Demand by John Doe(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed under Pseudonym by John Doe (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Eidelman, Levi) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by John Doe (Eidelman, Levi) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliantcy, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11075897.), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Eidelman, Levi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Reliantcy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Represented By: | Levi Yitzchok Eidelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliantcy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Meighan Griffin Burton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
