Loveland v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
| David Earl Loveland, Jr |
| Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney General, US Attorney District Court of Md. and Commissioner Social Security Admin. |
| 1:2024cv00577 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Charles D Austin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Supplement to #1 Complaint, filed by David Earl Loveland, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin on 2/29/2024. (cw5s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to David Earl Loveland, Jr. (c/m 2/27/2024)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Earl Loveland, Jr (Attachments: #1 Short Form)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security Admin., Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney District Court of Md., US Attorney General, filed by David Earl Loveland, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
