Black et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Matthew Black and Meredith Walker-Black |
| Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as Raiser, LLC also known as Rasier, LLC, Rasier, LLC, Lakeysha Rule, Francis A Pommett III and Sunita Baraili |
| 1:2024cv00604 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice; directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 3/7/2024. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Matthew Black, Meredith Walker-Black (Addington, Wesley) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by March 8th, 2024 as to why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 2/28/2024. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Sunita Baraili, Francis A Pommett III, Lakeysha Rule, Uber Technologies, Inc.(bw5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sunita Baraili, Francis A Pommett III, Lakeysha Rule, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11114129.), filed by Matthew Black, Meredith Walker-Black. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Addington, Wesley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
