Roger D. Silk v. Baron Bond et al
| Roger D. Silk |
| Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller |
| 1:2024cv00625 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Matthew J Maddox |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 64
Correspondence re: Counsel to Defendants (Nusinov, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 63
Corrected Transfer-in Notification Letter sent to Counsel. (Corrected to omit attorney Jeffrey E. Nusinov from letter as he is an attorney in good standing in the District of Maryland and had been added to case) (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/nef, c/m, and c/em to Counsel 3/1/24)
|
|
Filing 62
Transfer-in Notification Letter sent to Counsel. (c/nef, c/m, and c/em to Counsel 3/1/24) (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 61
Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-03977. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 60
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER #53 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Defendants Defendants Baron Bond and Howard Miller's Motion to Transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404. All dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Clerk of the Court shall TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, 101 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore,Maryland, 21201. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (Case electronically transferred on 2/29/2024) (lc) Modified on 2/29/2024 (lc).
|
|
Filing 59
The hearing on the MOTION to Transfer Case #53 , scheduled for October 2, 2023 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 58
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Maryland #53 filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Leung, Jeff)
|
|
Filing 57
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. (lc)
|
|
Filing 56
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JURY TRIAL) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: This Order is to advise the parties and counsel of the schedule that will govern this case. THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED.Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/21/2024 01:30 PM; Jury Trial set for 11/12/2024 09:00 AM; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 11/4/2024 at 01:30 PM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 55
JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Leung, Jeff)
|
|
Filing 54
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeff Leung counsel for Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. Adding Jeff Leung as counsel of record for Roger D. Silk for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attorney Jeff Leung added to party Roger D. Silk(pty:pla))(Leung, Jeff)
|
|
Filing 53
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the District of Maryland filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. Motion set for hearing on 10/2/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Baron Bond, #2 Declaration Declaration of Howard Miller, #3 Declaration Declaration of Jeffrey E. Nusinov, #4 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Nusinov, #5 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Nusinov, #6 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Nusinov, #7 Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Nusinov, #8 Proposed Order) (Nye, Gary)
|
|
Filing 51
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Aram Ordubegian in place of attorney Sara C. Colon and Ethan Brown of Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP for Plaintiff Roger D. Silk #50 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 50
REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Aram Ordubegian in place of attorney Sara C. Colon and Ethan Brown of Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Colon, Sara)
|
|
Filing 49
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for August 14, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 48
Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Stay Case, #45 filed by DEFENDANTS Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. (Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 47
ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANTS Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller.(Attorney Gary A Nye added to party Baron Bond(pty:dft), Attorney Gary A Nye added to party Howard B. Miller(pty:dft))(Nye, Gary)
|
|
Filing 46
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending resolution of the parallel Maryland action #45 filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 45
(WITHDRAWN BY DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL FILED DOCKET NO.48) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending resolution of the parallel Maryland action filed by DEFENDANTS Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffrey E Nusinov, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order) (Gjonola, Joseph) Modified on 6/2/2023 (lc).
|
|
Filing 44
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On May 2, 2023, the Court received the Mandate of the Ninth Circuit, reversing and remanding this matter back to this Court #43 . The Mandate is spread; this Court once again has jurisdiction over this action. In light of the Ninth Circuit's Mandate, the Court ORDERS Defendants Baron Bond and Howard Miller to Answer Plaintiff Roger Silk's Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.The Clerk of the Court shall re-open the case. (Case reopened. MD JS-5.) (lc)
|
|
Filing 43
MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #40 , CCA # 21-56286. The judgment of this Court, entered April 10, 2023, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Opinion, #42 REVERSED and REMANDED.](mat)
|
|
Filing 42
OPINION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #40 filed by Roger D. Silk. CCA # 21-56286. Because federal jurisdiction over this case is not barred by the probate exception, and because at this stage of the proceedings Silk has made a prima facie case for personal jurisdiction over the Estate, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED. [See document for more details.](mat)
|
|
Filing 41
NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-56286 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #40 as to Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. [Late docketing due to Document received 4/10/23.] (mat)
|
|
Filing 40
NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. Appeal of Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, #39 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32385688.) (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS #30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court Grants Defendants Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller are personal representatives of the estate of Frank Bond and move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction. All dates and deadlines are vacated. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
|
|
Filing 38
The hearing on the MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 , scheduled for September 13, 2021 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 37
REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Second Declaration of Baron Bond In Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 2 - Second Declaration of Howard B. Miller In Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 36
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ROGER D. SILK)(Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 35
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: RE Order Regarding the Filing of a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), (e), or (f). The Court has reviewed the Motion #30 . Without expressing any view as to the Motion's merits, the Court reminds Plaintiff(s) that [a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within... 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). If Plaintiff(s) timely file(s) an amended pleading, the pending Motion will be denied as moot. Otherwise, Plaintiff(s) must timely respond to the Motion. (lc)
|
|
Filing 34
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller, identifying ARLENE BOND, BARON BOND, BRANDON BOND, BRAD D. BONDROFF, as Trustee of the Frank Bond Living Trust; FRANK BONDROFF as Trustee of the Frank Bond Living Trust; SPERO MICHOS as Trustee of the Frank Bond Living Trust; HOWARD B. MILLER as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Bond. (Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION for Leave of JEFFREY E. NUSINOV to Appear for PRO HAC VICE on behalf of Defendants Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller and designating Joseph C. Gjonola as local counsel #27 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 32
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #28 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Motion no. 28 is STRICKEN; Amended Motion hearing date accepted. The hearing will take place before the Court on September 13, 2021 at 1 :30 p.m. Moreover, counsel must file their Notice of Interested Parties by no later than July 16, 2021. (lc)
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Clarification re Hearing. Filer attempting to change hearing date of initial motion to dismiss set for hearing 8/9/21 1:30 PM by refiling "Amended" Notice of Motion and Motion Set for 9/13/21 1:30 PM. Now one motion set on Judge's Motion Calendar for 2 different dates. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 30
Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. Motion set for hearing on 9/13/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit of Howard Miller, #3 Affidavit of Baron Bond, #4 Proposed Order) (Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 29
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: RE Order Regarding the Filing of a Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), (e), or (f). The Court has reviewed the Motion #28 . Without expressing any view as to the Motion's merits, the Court reminds Plaintiff(s) that [a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within... 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). If Plaintiff(s) timely file(s) an amended pleading, the pending Motion will be denied as moot. Otherwise, Plaintiff(s) must timely respond to the Motion. (lc)
|
|
Filing 28
(STRICKEN PER COURT'S 7/14/2021 G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 32). NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. Motion set for hearing on 8/9/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit of Howard Miller, #3 Affidavit of Baron Bond, #4 Proposed Order) (Gjonola, Joseph) Modified on 7/14/2021 (lc).
|
|
Filing 27
APPLICATION for Leave of JEFFREY E. NUSINOV to Appear for PRO HAC VICE , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney JEFFREY E. NUSINOV to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31619033) filed by Defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Joseph C Gjonola added to party Baron Bond(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph C Gjonola added to party Howard B. Miller(pty:dft)) (Gjonola, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 26
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk, upon Defendant Howard B. Miller served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Howard Miller in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 25
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk, upon Defendant Baron Bond served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Baron Bond in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk and designating Sara Colon as local counsel #21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Cyrulnik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk and designating Sara Colon as local counsel #20 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adina C. Levine to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk and designating Sara Colon as local counsel #19 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 21
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31349364) filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 20
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Cyrulnik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31349353) filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 19
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adina C. Levine to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31349328) filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 18
Notice of Electronic Filing re Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form,,, #8 , Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 , Notice of Deficiency in Electronically filed Pro Hac Vice Application (G-112C) - optional html form,, #16 , Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form,,, #10 , Striking Electronically Filed Documents (G-106),,, #17 , Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form,,, #9 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 e-mailed to Jason C Cyrulnikat at jcyunlik@cf-llp.com bounced due to Clerk entered email with a typo. Primary e-mail address corrected. Notice of Electronic Filing resent addressed to jcyrulnik@cf-llp.com. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ir) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Cyrulnik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326741) #13 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326746) #14 , for the following reasons: Comply with instructions on discrepancy doc no #16 . Refile CORRECTLY. Send proposed order in word to the judge's chambers email. Application incomplete: missing Local Counsel State Bar No. (lc)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Cyrulnik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326741) #13 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326746) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. (lt)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Complete case number is to include assigned Judge and Magistrate initials as: 2:21-cv-03977-ODW-JPRx. Other error(s) with document(s): Re Missing proposed order: As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as Separate Attachment thereto.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 14
(STRICKEN PER 5/21/2021 ORDER DOCKET NO. 17). APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326746) filed by plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brown, Ethan) Modified on 5/21/2021 (lc).
|
|
Filing 13
(STRICKEN PER 5/21/2021 ORDER DOCKET NO. 17). APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Cyrulnik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Roger D. Silk (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31326741) filed by plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brown, Ethan) Modified on 5/21/2021 (lc).
|
|
Filing 12
APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Adina Levine. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paul Fattaruso. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jason Cyrulnik. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa)
|
|
Filing 7
21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Baron Bond, Howard B. Miller. (esa)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk, identifying Roger D. Silk; Baron Bond; Howard B. Miller. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Brown, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31278089 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Roger D. Silk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Ethan J Brown added to party Roger D. Silk(pty:pla))(Brown, Ethan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
