Rawlings v. Bank of America, N.A.
Charles Rawlings |
Bank of America, N.A., John Driscoll, III and Samuel I. White, PC |
1:2024cv01033 |
April 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Brendan Abell Hurson |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Bank of America, N.A. served on 5/22/2024, answer due 6/12/2024. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued 21 days as to Bank of America, N.A. (c/em USMS 5/14/2024 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bank of America, N.A., filed by Charles Rawlings. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 USMS Forms for Non-Parties, #3 Summons for Non-Parties, #4 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint by Charles Rawlings (Attachments: #1 First Page of Amended Complaint) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
![]() |
Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Charles Rawlings. (c/m p 4/9/24 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Rawlings (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America, N.A., John Driscoll, III, Samuel I. White, PC, filed by Charles Rawlings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.