Nosav v. Mayorkas et al
Yury Nosav |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and Merrick B. Garland |
1:2024cv01043 |
April 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Matthew J Maddox |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Tamunotonte Fenny. Directing attorney Tamunotonte Fenny to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 4/10/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 60 days as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Tamunotonte Fenny (Filing fee $100, receipt number BMDDC-11194079.) by YURY NOSAV(Taylor, Dawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11194075.), filed by YURY NOSAV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet COVER SHEET, #2 Summons MAYORKAS, #3 Summons US ATTY, #4 Summons Jaddou, #5 Summons KIM, #6 Summons ATTY GEN, #7 Exhibit EX. A)(Taylor, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.