Matthews v. Cabrales et al
| Ellis Matthews |
| Hector E. Cabrales, Dale Clark, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Corporation |
| 1:2024cv01133 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Hector E. Cabrales, Dale Clark, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Corporation filed by Ellis Matthews.(slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.5 (Cleaver, Amber) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Home Depot USA Inc identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot USA, Inc. for Home Depot USA Inc.(Cleaver, Amber) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County, case number C-02-CV-24-000508. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11210989), filed by Home Depot USA Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3)(Cleaver, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
