Kennedy v. Allegis Group et al
| AG Kennedy |
| Allegis Group, Stephanie Vargas, Actalent, S. Wiley and M. Williams |
| 1:2024cv01635 |
| June 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 5:24-cv-01155. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 13
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 6/4/24. 6/4/24 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ALLEGIS GROUP, Actalent, Stephanie Vargas, M WILLIAMS, S. Wiley, filed by AG Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Page)(fdc) |
| Filing 11 PLAINTIFF MOTION TO STAY ORDER DATED 29 APRIL 2024, REQUEST APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, MOTION TO EXTEND THIRTY (30) DAYS POST APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL filed by AG Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 email attachment, #3 attachment, #4 cover page)(er) |
| E-mail address for AG Kennedy added and notification regenerated of memo/order #9 and #10. Employment Discrimination Complaint Form E-mailed to AG Kennedy. (fdc) |
| DOC. NOS. #9 AND #10 MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT FORM MAILED TO PRO SE ON 4/30/24. (amas) |
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM AS FOLLOWS: A. THE ADEA CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS STEPHANIE VARGAS, S. WILEY AND M. WILLIAMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. B. THE BALANCE OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO AMENDMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH FOUR (4) OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 4/29/24. 4/29/24 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO KENNEDY.(fdc)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 4/29/24. 4/29/24 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO KENNEDY. (fdc) |
| Filing 8 Letter dated 4/19/24 by AG Kennedy (Attachments: #1 Cover Page)(fdc) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt) |
| Pro Se Guidelines Mailed Out on 3/20/24. (sbt) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 3:24-cv-00436. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 3/15/24. (ms) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 3/18/2024.]
|
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Excerpts from Local Rules) (dj) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 3/18/2024.] |
| Filing 3 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (dj) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 3/18/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AG Kennedy.(dj) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 3/18/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by AG Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Exhibit(s))(dj) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 3/18/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
