Rodrigues Soares v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares
Defendant: Ur Medoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Connie Nolan
Case Number: 1:2024cv02117
Filed: July 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2024 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares. All Defendants.(Gondim, Marcelo)
August 1, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares. All Defendants.(Gondim, Marcelo)
July 31, 2024 Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Marcelo Gondim. Directing attorney Marcelo Gondim to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 7/31/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
July 31, 2024 Filing 5 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Marcelo Gondim by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares. The fee has already been paid.(Griffith, Raymond)
July 23, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued 60 days as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Medoza Jaddou, Connie Nolan, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(ar6s, Deputy Clerk)
July 23, 2024 Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares needs to be modified. See attachment for details and corrective actions needed regarding the signature(s) on the motion. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)
July 23, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Marcelo Gondim (Filing fee $100, receipt number BMDDC-11386135.) by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares(Griffith, Raymond)
July 23, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11386128.), filed by Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Griffith, Raymond)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodrigues Soares v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Medoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connie Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felipe Mafra Rodrigues Soares
Represented By: Raymond Orlando Griffith
Represented By: Marcelo Gondim
Represented By: Marcelo Gondim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?