TD Bank, N.A. v. The Cadata Corporation et al
Plaintiff: TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant: The Cadata Corporation and Thai Van Nguyen
Case Number: 1:2024cv02439
Filed: August 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Charles D Austin
Referring Judge: Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE by TD Bank, N.A. re 2 QC Notice - Miscellaneous, #3 Notice (Other), 4 QC Notice - Miscellaneous, (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Attachment Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession to the Cadata Corp., #3 Attachment Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession to Nguyen)(Furshman, Laurie)
August 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin for reviewing a complaint for judgment by confession. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 8/22/2024. (bw5s, Deputy Clerk)
August 22, 2024 Filing 4 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint,, filed by TD Bank, N.A. was filed incorrectly. **Incorrect Clerk of Court listed on Notice of Entry of Judgment by Confession. Please refile corrected Notices using the event "Notice (Other)" (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 22, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE by TD Bank, N.A. re 2 QC Notice - Miscellaneous, Proposed Order for the Entry of Judgment by Confession (Furshman, Laurie)
August 22, 2024 Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint,, filed by TD Bank, N.A. was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Proposed Order for the Entry of Judgment by Confession. To correct this problem, file Proposed Order for the Entry of Judgment by Confession using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Order for the Entry of Judgment by Confession to #1 . (ybs, Deputy Clerk)
August 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION against THAI VAN NGUYEN, The Cadata Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11445238.), filed by TD Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 McTaggart Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 2 Note (redacted), #3 Exhibit 3 Guaranty (redacted), #4 Exhibit 4 Demand Letter (redacted), #5 Exhibit 5 Furshman Affidavit, #6 Exhibit 6 Non-Military Status Affidavit, #7 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order and Confessed Judgment, #8 Attachment, #9 Attachment, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Furshman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TD Bank, N.A. v. The Cadata Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TD Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Laurie Goon Furshman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Cadata Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thai Van Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?