Standiford v. Colvin
| David Standiford |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Ssaogcomms SSA Notify |
| 1:2024cv03601 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Charles D Austin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin on 12/13/2024. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Carolyn W. Colvin. A certified copy of the transcript of the record is due on 2/11/2025 unless otherwise ordered. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Shea, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11660305.), filed by David Standiford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shea, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
