Solis, et al v. Malkani, et al
| Hilda L. Solis |
| Roma Malkani, Information Systems and Networks Corporation Employees' Pension Plan, Information Systems and Networks Corporation Profit Sharing Plan, Information Systems & Networks Corporation and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. |
| 8:2000cv03491 |
| January 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Susan K. Gauvey |
| William D Quarles |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 7/18/11. (bmh, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
402
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 393 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Hilda L. Solis Signed by: Judge Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2011; Responses due by 6/24/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 6/7/11. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
392
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by: Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 3/1/11. (bmh, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
374
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 1/20/10. (das, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
351
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 11/16/09. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
340
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 10/16/09. (das, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
