Vales et al v. Preciado et al
| 8:2005cv03110 |
| November 16, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Deborah K. Chasanow |
| William Connelly |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
361
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 181 Amended Complaint filed by Lourdes Vales, 94 Crossclaim filed by Dorita Lemos Down Signed by: Judge Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 10/11/2013. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
341
MEMORANDUM OPINION 30 Correspondence re: Memorandum on Judgment Calculation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 09/11/2013. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
285
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 1/13/2012. (bf2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
252
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Defendants Universal Business Systems, Inc., William H. Camp, Jr., Dorita L. Down, Alma Preciado and Metropolitan Financial Services 8/9/11 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 8/9/11. (sat, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vales et al v. Preciado et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
