Adonni v. Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Plaintiff: Abange Adonni
Defendant: Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Case Number: 8:2008cv02319
Filed: September 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: Roger W Titus
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 2/16/2010. (rank, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adonni v. Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abange Adonni
Represented By: Richard Lloyd Thompson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?