Espinoza et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Reggie Espinoza and Lisa Espinoza |
Michelin North America, Inc. and Nissan North America, Inc. |
8:2009cv00399 |
February 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
88888 |
Roger W Titus |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 MEMORANDUM/ORDER RESCHEDULING the telephone conference previously scheduled for March 22, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. to 9:30 a.m. on the same day.. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 3/15/2010. (cm, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 27 MDL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Maryland re: MDL No 1911. Case transmitted electronically to District of Maryland. CASE CLOSED (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 25 [DISREGARD - FILED IN ERROR] MDL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Maryland re: MDL No 1911. Case transmitted electronically to District of Maryland. CASE CLOSED (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 02/03/09 GRANTING 17 Stipulated Application For Extension of Time To Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant NNA is granted an extension of time until five days after either 1) this court rules on plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to the Superior Court or 2) any order to transfer this case to another Federal District Court in the event this court does not rule on the remand motion. (Streeter, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.