MACHIE v. MANGER et al
| EDMOND K. MACHIE |
| J. Thomas Manger, NANCY DEMME, PAK and K. C. HAAK |
| 8:2009cv02196 |
| August 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| 88888 |
| Alexander Williams |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 115 Motion of defendant in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Concerning Probable Cause; granting 116 Motion of defendant in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Regarding Internal Affairs Investigations; granting in part and denying in part 117 Motion of defendant in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Concerning Damages; granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion of defendant in Limine to Exclude Expert Witness Evidence and Testimony. Signed by Judge Alexander Williams, Jr on 11/12/13. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Alexander Williams, Jr on 7/2/2013. (nss, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 8/23/2012. (nss, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 6/7/2012. (nss, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Alexander Williams, Jr on 5/25/10. (cm, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
