Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund et al
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund |
Advanced Safety, Inc. and Automatic Sprinkler |
8:2010cv01611 |
June 17, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Greenbelt Office |
Allegany |
Deborah K. Chasanow |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Defendants 5/25/11 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 5/25/11. (sat, Chambers) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 4/21/11. (sat, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund | |
Represented By: | Charles W Gilligan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund | |
Represented By: | Charles W Gilligan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund | |
Represented By: | Charles W Gilligan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund | |
Represented By: | Charles W Gilligan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Advanced Safety, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Automatic Sprinkler | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.