Daobin et al v. CISCO Systems, Inc. et al
| Du Daobin, Zhou Yuanzhi, Liu Xianbin and Does 1-10 |
| CISCO Systems, Inc., Thomas Lam, Owen Chan, Rick Justice and John T. Chambers |
| 8:2011cv01538 |
| June 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Prince George's |
| Peter J. Messitte |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by CISCO Systems, Inc. Responses due by 8/8/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bisbee, Lincoln) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Stay by CISCO Systems, Inc. Responses due by 8/8/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bisbee, Lincoln) |
| Filing 16 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kathleen M. Sullivan by CISCO Systems, Inc., John T. Chambers, Owen Chan, Rick Justice, Thomas Lam. (Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0416-3075168) (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 15 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Isaac Nesser by CISCO Systems, Inc., John T. Chambers, Owen Chan, Rick Justice, Thomas Lam. (Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0416-3075155) (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 14 CORRECTED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Faith E. Gay by CISCO Systems, Inc., John T. Chambers, Owen Chan, Rick Justice, Thomas Lam. (Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0416-3075148) (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 13 QC NOTICE: 10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by CISCO Systems, Inc. needs to be modified. See attachment for details and corrective actions needed regarding the signature(s) on the motion. (nrm, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 QC NOTICE: 9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by CISCO Systems, Inc. needs to be modified. See attachment for details and corrective actions needed regarding the signature(s) on the motion. (nrm, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 QC NOTICE: 8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by CISCO Systems, Inc. needs to be modified. See attachment for details and corrective actions needed regarding the signature(s) on the motion. (nrm, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING 6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 7/7/2011. (jchss, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by CISCO Systems, Inc. Responses due by 7/25/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bisbee, Lincoln) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lincoln Owens Bisbee on behalf of All Defendants (Bisbee, Lincoln) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to CISCO Systems, Inc., John T. Chambers, Owen Chan, Rick Justice, Thomas Lam. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Supplemental to 1 Complaint filed by Du Daobin, Does 1-10, Liu Xianbin, Zhou Yuanzhi Summons. (Ward, Daniel) Modified on 6/8/2011 (kn, Deputy Clerk)(Hard Copy rec'd 6/8/11). |
| Filing 2 Supplemental to 1 Complaint filed by Du Daobin, Does 1-10, Liu Xianbin, Zhou Yuanzhi Civil Cover Sheet. (Ward, Daniel) Modified on 6/8/2011 (kn, Deputy Clerk)(Hard Copy rec'd 6/8/11). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0416-3026952.), filed by Du Daobin, Zhou Yuanzhi, Does 1-10, Liu Xianbin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 6/8/2011 (kn, Deputy Clerk)(Hard Copy rec'd 6/8/11). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
