Harrison-Khatana v. Cannon et al
| Deborah Harrison-Khatana |
| S. Cannon and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
| 8:2011cv03715 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Prince George's |
| Deborah K. Chasanow |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 1/22/2015. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 39 motion for leave to file an amended complaint, DIRECTING Plaintiff to file, within 14 days, an amended complaint excising the IIED claim and supporting factual allegations propose d in the amended complaint attached to her motion (ECF No. 39-1), but identical in all respects as to her Rehabilitation Act claim, and DENYING AS MOOT 29 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 8/27/13. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 17 Motion for Reconsideration (c/m to Plaintiff 12/21/12 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 12/21/12. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 10/31/12 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 10/31/12. (sat, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
