Hurst v. District of Columbia
Plaintiff: Jacqueline K. Hurst
Defendant: District of Columbia
Case Number: 8:2012cv02537
Filed: August 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Baltimore County
Presiding Judge: Deborah K. Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment; directing clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 3/16/2015. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
November 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/5/12. (sat, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hurst v. District of Columbia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline K. Hurst
Represented By: John B Stolarz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District of Columbia
Represented By: Denise Juanita Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?