Funderburk v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.

Plaintiff: Carla Funderburk
Defendant: Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2013cv01078
Filed: April 11, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Roger W Titus
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 5, 2014 38 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 37 Request for Status Conference; Judgment for costs is entered in favor of the Defendant. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 11/5/2014. (c/m 11/5/14 ca2s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Funderburk v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla Funderburk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.