Stevens et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
| Valerie M Stevens and Famesha Okoeka |
| USAA Federal Savings Bank and U.S. Bank National Association |
| 8:2015cv01780 |
| June 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Prince George's |
| Deborah K. Chasanow |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 47 supplemental motion for attorneys' fees, ORDERING Plaintiffs to pay Defendant USAA Federal Savings Bank $4,000.00 in attorneys fees, and DIRECTING the clerk to CLOSE this case (c/m to Plaintiffs 5/8/17 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 5/8/2017. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiffs to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice and why they should not be ordered to pay reasonable attorneys' fees within 14 days (c/m to Plaintiffs 10/31/16 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 10/31/2016. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion to Compel and DIRECTING Plaintiffs to provide full and complete responses to the requests propounded by Defendant USAA by no later than July 22, 2016 (c/m to Plaintiffs 7/6/16 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 7/6/2016. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 9/4/2015. (sat, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
