USA v. Santoso
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Sharon Santoso
Case Number: 8:2017cv03030
Filed: October 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Paul W. Grimm
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER reinstating and granting 54 Motion to Dismiss the Petition and Quash the Summons filed by Sharon Santoso. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/29/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/14/2018. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Santoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Richard Jeremy Hagerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Santoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?