Bruns v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Clinton A. Bruns
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 8:2018cv01529
Filed: May 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: St. Mary's
Referring Judge: Stephanie A Gallagher
Presiding Judge: Roger W Titus
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:423
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Clinton A. Bruns, 1 Complaint filed by Clinton A. Bruns, 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie A Gallagher on 2/25/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruns v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clinton A. Bruns
Represented By: Laurie Durham Pulliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Vickie LeDuc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?