Besong v. Sessions
Petitioner: Powell Ntube Besong
Respondent: Jeff Sessions
Case Number: 8:2018cv02120
Filed: July 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Anne Arundel
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Powell Ntube Besong(nu, Deputy Clerk)
July 10, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Powell Ntube Besong. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Besong v. Sessions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Sessions
Represented By: Vickie LeDuc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Powell Ntube Besong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?