Moore v. Peitzmeier et al
| Christopher Moore |
| Catherine Brewer, Artemis Goode, Joshua Swecker, Joseph Alvarez, Roderick Cox, Thomas Conlon, John Christ, Montgomery County, Maryland, Douglas Miller, Michael Peitzmeier, Samuel Supnick, Nathan Lenhart, Yvesdidier Nkodia, Marcus Hendricks and Christopher Diez-Canseco |
| 8:2018cv02151 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| Montgomery |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER approving #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Brewer, Christ, Conlon, Cox, Diez-Canseco, Goode, Hendricks, Supnick and Swecker; partially dismissing without prejudice as to Defendant Miller. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 9/12/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Victoria Haggerty on behalf of Joseph Alvarez, Nathan Lenhart, Douglas Miller, Montgomery County, Maryland, Yvesdidier Nkodia, Michael Peitzmeier (Haggerty, Patricia) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' Reply or Response to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint is now due September 24, 2018. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 9/10/18. (nrs, Chambers)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Joseph Alvarez, Nathan Lenhart, Douglas Miller, Montgomery County, Maryland, Yvesdidier Nkodia, Michael Peitzmeier.(Kane, Patricia) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christopher Moore (Downs, Jason) |
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Artemis Goode, Yvesdidier Nkodia, and Samuel Supnick. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Joseph Alvarez served on 8/14/2018, answer due 9/4/2018; Catherine Brewer served on 8/14/2018, answer due 9/4/2018; John Christ served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018; Thomas Conlon served on 8/15/2018, answer due 9/5/2018.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Michael Peitzmeier served on 8/7/2018, answer due 8/28/2018.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Roderick Cox served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018; Christopher Diez-Canseco served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018; Nathan Lenhart served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018; Douglas Miller served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018; Joshua Swecker served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018. (Attachment: #1 Envelope from Legal Papers Inc.) (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 7/19/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Joseph Alvarez, Catherine Brewer, John Christ, Thomas Conlon, Roderick Cox, Christopher Diez-Canseco, Artemis Goode, Marcus Hendricks, Nathan Lenhart, Douglas Miller, Montgomery County, Maryland, Yvesdidier Nkodia, Michael Peitzmeier, Samuel Supnick, Joshua Swecker.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Alvarez, Catherine Brewer, John Christ, Thomas Conlon, Roderick Cox, Christopher Diez-Canseco, Artemis Goode, Marcus Hendricks, Nathan Lenhart, Douglas Miller, Montgomery County, Maryland, Yvesdidier Nkodia, Michael Peitzmeier, Samuel Supnick, Joshua Swecker filed by Christopher Moore. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637107617.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
